Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper critiques generative image models by analyzing the latent diffusion model's mechanisms and their ideological implications within visual culture. It reveals how these models automate decisions that abstract social communication into commodifiable vectors, effectively transforming social interactions into a neural economy. The findings highlight the risks of focusing solely on copyright issues, advocating instead for a critique centered on social exchange to counteract the fetishism inherent in these models.
Generative models may not just produce images; they commodify social interactions, embedding ideological biases that reshape visual culture.
Valuable critique of generative image models within visual culture and the humanities has emphasized the role of datasets in shaping the images they produce. Yet, close studies of the ideological positions embedded into the mechanism of the models have been neglected, leaving them imagined as "black boxes." In a bid to expand, rather than replace, dataset critique, this paper examines the mechanisms of the latent diffusion model in terms of the problems they were brought in to solve on behalf of computer vision engineers, and the decisions each component was tasked with automating. I interpret that ensemble through the histories of its parts and the theory of vision the system inscribes into every generated image. Drawing on Impett and Offert's notion of neural exchange value, I offer this analysis to argue that the model operates as a neural economy: a contained symbolic system that abstracts social communication into commensurable vectors as it transfers the social sphere into parcels for sale. Tracing the training and generation pipelines component by component reveals what each operation displaces, and how it further entrenches the logics of platform and attention economies over social communication. The paper warns that any critique fixated exclusively on copyright and commodity defenses risks reaffirming the very fetishism the model produces, and argues instead for centering social exchange.
