Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces SciRisk-Bench, a comprehensive benchmark aimed at assessing the safety of large language models (LLMs) in AI4Science applications by focusing on explicit risk dimensions across various scientific disciplines. The benchmark encompasses 7 disciplines, 31 subdisciplines, and 10 distinct risk dimensions, addressing a critical gap in existing safety evaluations that often overlook the nuanced risks associated with scientific tasks. Experimental evaluations reveal significant insights into the safety shortcomings of both mainstream and science-oriented LLMs, highlighting specific areas where these models fail to adequately recognize and mitigate risks in high-stakes contexts.
Mainstream LLMs struggle to navigate safety risks in scientific applications, revealing critical vulnerabilities in AI4Science workflows.
Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly embedded in AI for Science (AI4Science) workflows, from scientific question answering and literature analysis to laboratory planning and autonomous discovery. This progress creates an urgent need for safety benchmarks that evaluate not only scientific competence, but also whether models recognize and avoid risks in high-stakes scientific contexts. Existing AI4Science safety datasets cover several disciplines and task formats, leaving the underlying risk dimensions underspecified. We introduce \textbf{SciRisk-Bench}, a benchmark designed to evaluate AI4Science safety from two complementary perspectives: explicit risk dimensions and scientific disciplines. SciRisk-Bench covers 7 disciplines, 31 subdisciplines and 10 risk dimensions. In the experimental section, we evaluate both mainstream LLMs and science-oriented LLMs across risk dimensions, disciplines, and sub-disciplines, enabling fine-grained diagnosis of where scientific models remain unsafe.
