Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces Trajectory-Augmented Policy Optimization (TAPO), a novel method for self-distillation in large language models that shifts from implicit logit-level alignment to explicit trajectory construction. By generating both correct and incorrect rollouts during reinforcement learning, TAPO allows models to create micro-reflective corrections that provide targeted feedback on their reasoning errors. The results show that TAPO consistently outperforms traditional methods like GRPO, enhancing both initial reasoning and error correction capabilities across multiple benchmark datasets.
Self-distillation can be transformed from mere imitation of a privileged distribution to a powerful tool for diagnosing and correcting specific reasoning failures in large language models.
Self-distillation improves reasoning in large language models by using the model's own rollouts as training signal, typically through implicit logit-level alignment that minimizes KL divergence toward a privileged target distribution. However, because this supervision is generated via uncontrolled sampling, it provides no diagnostic insight into the model's specific errors or corrective guidance for its individual failure patterns. Consequently, the model learns to imitate a privileged distribution rather than receiving fine-grained corrections that pinpoint where and why its reasoning fails. In this paper, we propose Trajectory-Augmented Policy Optimization (TAPO), which advances self-distillation from implicit distributional alignment to explicit trajectory construction. During RL training, the model produces both correct and incorrect rollouts to the same query, and TAPO leverages this contrastive structure to construct micro-reflective corrections, new training trajectories that retain the model's erroneous reasoning up to the point of failure, then insert a natural-language diagnosis and corrected reasoning guided by a correct reference from the same sampling group. Since each trajectory is anchored in the learner's own prefix and solutions, the corrective signal preserves the model's on-policy distribution to a greater extent than the position-wise alignment imposed by KL-based methods. To integrate these trajectories, TAPO introduces difficulty-aware candidate selection at the model's capability boundary and decoupled advantage estimation to prevent gradient contamination. Experiments on AIME 2024, AIME 2025, and HMMT 2025 show that TAPO achieves consistent improvements over GRPO under the same number of training steps. Further analysis demonstrates that TAPO strengthens both first-pass reasoning and error-correction effectiveness.
DAMO
Tsinghua AI