Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This study systematically investigates the underground market for censorship circumvention proxies, termed "airports," in China, revealing their widespread use among citizens seeking to bypass government restrictions. Through user surveys and network analysis, the authors found that over half of the respondents utilize these tools due to their superior performance and ease of access to restricted services like ChatGPT and Netflix. Despite their effectiveness, the research highlights significant security risks and fragility associated with airports, including payment vulnerabilities and government takedowns, which complicate their use and reliability.
Over half of Chinese citizens use "airports" for censorship circumvention, but these tools come with hidden security risks and fragility.
In China, a burgeoning underground market sells citizens subscription-based censorship circumvention proxies known as ''airports''. We present the first systematic study of this ecosystem, combining user surveys, social media analysis, and active network measurements. We find that airports are by far the most popular off-the-shelf censorship circumvention tool in China, used by over half of our 1,667~survey respondents, who cite their ease of use, performance, and access to geo-restricted services like ChatGPT and Netflix. By scanning the Internet and scraping Telegram announcement channels, we identify 3,431 active airports built on a handful of open-source toolkits. We subscribe to 35 airports and characterize their performance, which often surpasses direct connections through the Great Firewall due to a distinctive multi-hop architecture. However, airports also pose new challenges and security risks: they accept payment through commercial services like Alipay, suffer frequent government takedowns, and are difficult for clients to configure optimally. Many airports also deploy their own distinct censorship policies. Airports are far more widely used than other circumvention tools from the academic literature, but introduce new forms of fragility and control, offering both lessons and opportunities for future circumvention research.
Stanford HAI