Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This study rigorously evaluates the adversarial robustness of Anthropic's Fable 5 and Opus 4.8 models against a variety of automated jailbreak attacks targeting 7,826 harmful intents. Utilizing the HackAgent red-teaming framework, the research reveals that while both models resist most attacks, they remain vulnerable, particularly to adaptive iterative strategies, with Opus 4.8 being compromised on 11.5% of intents compared to Fable 5's 6.1%. The findings highlight that even advanced models can produce harmful outputs under sustained automated adversarial pressure, challenging the perception of their robustness.
Even the most advanced LLMs can be reliably compromised, with Opus 4.8 failing on 11.5% of harmful intents under sustained attack.
We evaluate the adversarial robustness of two frontier large language models (LLMs) developed by Anthropic, Fable 5 and Opus 4.8, against four families of automated jailbreak attack across 7 826 harmful intents spanning a ten-category harm taxonomy. Using the HackAgent red-teaming framework, hundreds of thousands of adversarial attempts were generated and every apparent success was independently re-adjudicated by a panel of three judge models (majority vote). Both models resist the majority of attacks, but the residual surface is larger than aggregate framing suggests: it is dominated by adaptive iterative attacks, while static obfuscation is near-fully neutralised. The strongest adaptive search (tree-of-attacks) breaks Opus 4.8 on 11.5% of intents overall, whereas Fable 5 stays in the single digits (6.1% worst-case). Aggregate rates therefore should not be read as reassurance. Even in these hardened configurations, the two models produced 1 620 (Opus 4.8) and 702 (Fable 5) panel-confirmed harmful completions spanning every harm category, located automatically, cheaply, and within the first one or two refinement steps by an attacker model with no human expert in the loop. The reasonable conclusion is that even the best, most-tested frontier models remain reliably breakable under sustained automated pressure.
