Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces an automated prompt optimization framework for LLM agents that enhances their performance in interactive environments by decomposing the observation-to-action pipeline into a goal-conditioned descriptor agent and an action selection agent. The framework employs an LLM-driven evolutionary loop to iteratively refine prompts based on environment returns, utilizing a behavior analyzer to link outcomes to specific prompt components and a mutator for targeted revisions. Evaluation on the BALROG benchmark shows significant performance improvements, with the proposed method achieving a 72.5% success rate on the PutNext task, compared to 0% for the baseline agent, demonstrating the efficacy of automated prompt optimization without model fine-tuning.
Automated prompt optimization can boost LLM performance in complex tasks, achieving up to 72.5% success where traditional methods fail completely.
LLM agents in interactive environments are highly sensitive to their prompts, yet prompt engineering remains a manual, task-specific process. We introduce an automated prompt optimization framework for LLM agents that decomposes the observation-to-action pipeline into a goal-conditioned descriptor agent and an action selection agent, and iteratively refines each module's prompt through an LLM-driven evolutionary loop guided by environment returns. We propose a behavior analyzer to attribute episode outcomes to specific prompt components, and a mutator to propose targeted revisions to the prompt, before validating them through environment rollouts. We evaluate on all five BabyAI tasks in the BALROG benchmark, comparing our pipeline against BALROG's RobustCoTAgent under both plain and guided prompt initializations. Optimization improves performance consistently across tasks and conditions, without requiring updates to the model weights. On PutNext, a multi-step coordination task where the RobustCoTAgent achieves 0% success, our framework reaches up to 72.5% success rate using the same underlying LLM with optimized prompts. These results suggest that a multi-agent framework, combined with automatic prompt optimization, enhances LLMs without the need for fine-tuning or extensive human supervision.
