Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This study evaluates the impact of New York City's congestion pricing program on urban mobility by employing time series foundation models to create probabilistic counterfactual demand forecasts. The findings reveal significant increases in bus and subway ridership post-implementation, contrasting with a modest overall decrease in travel demand, with notable spatial disparities in these effects. The research underscores the importance of understanding socio-demographic factors in the adaptation to such policies, revealing implications for spatial equity in urban transit systems.
Post-congestion pricing, NYC saw a surge in transit ridership while overall travel demand fell, highlighting the complex interplay of urban mobility and pricing policies.
New York City implemented the nation's first cordon-based congestion pricing program in January 2025, providing an opportunity to evaluate how system-wide urban mobility responds to large-scale pricing interventions. Because such policies generate spillovers across modes and locations, credible control groups are difficult to construct. We address this challenge using time series foundation models to generate probabilistic counterfactual demand forecasts with calibrated uncertainty. Applying this framework to bus, subway, and aggregate trip volume data, we find that post-policy bus and subway ridership increased significantly relative to expected no-policy demand, while overall travel demand decreased modestly. The effects are spatially heterogeneous: while reductions in overall travel demand are concentrated within the Congestion Relief Zone, transit gains extend beyond Manhattan's core. Socio-demographic analyses further reveal uneven adaptation across neighborhoods, highlighting spatial equity implications. Our framework provides a scalable approach for the uncertainty-aware evaluation of system-wide urban interventions when clean control groups are unavailable.