Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces a Bayesian framework for magnetic resonance image reconstruction that incorporates uncertainty quantification through sparsity prior models. By formulating the reconstruction as a linear inverse problem and employing a Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) method, the authors demonstrate improved image quality and effective uncertainty estimation compared to traditional optimization methods. The results, validated on both single-coil and multi-coil datasets, reveal a strong correlation between the generated uncertainty maps and error metrics, outperforming existing deep learning approaches.
Uncertainty quantification in MRI reconstruction can now be achieved with superior accuracy, revealing critical insights into image reliability that deep learning methods overlook.
We propose a novel framework for uncertainty quantification using compressed sensing magnetic resonance image reconstruction. The problem is formulated within a Bayesian framework as a linear inverse problem, with prior distributions assigned to the unknown model parameters. Specifically, the image to be reconstructed is assumed to be sparse in a given basis. We develop a general framework applicable to any basis and as examples, we test the sparsity of the image in its (1) spatial gradients using a total variation prior model, and in its (2) wavelet transform. A Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) method, based on a split-and-augmented Gibbs sampler, is then employed to sample from the posterior distribution of the unknown parameters. The non-differentiable conditional distributions are efficiently sampled using a proximal MCMC method. The proposed algorithms are validated on both single-coil and multi-coil datasets using various k-space sub-sampling patterns and ratios. The results demonstrate the superior performance of each proposed approach in reconstructing images compared to its counterpart optimisation-based method. Moreover, our framework effectively quantifies uncertainty, showing a notable correlation between estimated uncertainty maps and error maps computed using ground truth and reconstructed images, compared with existing deep learning-based methods.
