Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces PDAGENT-BENCH, a comprehensive benchmark designed to evaluate the capabilities of LLMs and VLMs in the physical design of Very Large-Scale Integrated Circuits (VLSI). The benchmark addresses the critical gap in standardized assessments for agentic workflows in VLSI physical design, featuring 353 curated problems that assess foundational knowledge, report comprehension, root-cause analysis, script generation, and full-flow implementation. Experiments reveal that while modern models excel in conceptual tasks, they struggle with tool-centric execution and multi-stage reasoning, highlighting the need for human-skill-enhanced workflows to improve performance.
LLMs and VLMs excel at conceptual tasks but falter in practical execution, achieving only 42.2% success in script generation for VLSI design.
Large Language Models and vision-language models have shown remarkable success in the front-end design of Very Large-Scale Integrated Circuits, yet their capabilities for VLSI physical design remain significantly underexplored. The primary cause is the lack of standardized benchmarks for evaluating agentic physical design workflows that require high-dimensional, multi-stage optimization under strict design constraints, coordinated interaction with diverse Electronic Design Automation tools, and iterative refinement. This work introduces PDAGENT-BENCH, a comprehensive and multi-dimensional benchmark for evaluating LLM/VLM-based agents across the physical design stack. PDAGENT-BENCH integrates both task-level assessment and workflow-level execution. The benchmark suite contains 353 curated problems that combine conceptual questions with real-world industrial artifacts, with expert-validated references and executable solutions. These tasks cover five key capability dimensions: foundational knowledge, report comprehension, root-cause analysis, script generation, and full-flow implementation. In addition, the benchmark provides a unified, human-aligned agentic physical design workflow framework that enables closed-loop evaluation of holistic physical design in realistic EDA environments. Experiments on 11 state-of-the-art models reveal that while modern LLMs/VLMs perform competitively on conceptual tasks, they remain substantially limited in tool-centric execution (e.g., 42.2% on Innovus script generation) and long-horizon, multi-stage reasoning. Our studies further show that human-skill-enhanced agentic workflows significantly improve end-to-end physical design performance. PDAGENT-BENCH establishes a standardized, reproducible, and realistic evaluation framework for advancing LLM/VLM-driven holistic physical design automation. We will open source the benchmark and framework soon.
