Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces Text-Vision Co-Instructed Image Editing (TV-Edit), which integrates textual instructions with visual prompts to enhance image editing precision and semantic fidelity. By constructing a dataset of over 23,000 paired textual-visual instructions from dynamic videos, the authors enable effective cross-modal supervision. The results show that TV-Edit achieves superior spatial control and structural consistency compared to existing text-only and drag-based editing methods, as validated by the newly established TV-Edit-Bench benchmark.
TV-Edit achieves unprecedented precision in image editing by merging the semantic richness of text with the spatial accuracy of visual prompts.
Existing image editing methods can be generally categorized into textual instruction-based and visual prompt-based ones. Textual instructions are semantically expressive, but are limited by the coarse granularity of spatial control of the editing results. In contrast, visual prompts such as drag and point can provide precise spatial guidance, but are limited by the inherent ambiguity in semantic intent. To unify the strength of textual and visual prompts, we present Text-Vision Co-Instructed Image Editing, which jointly models textual instructions as semantic intent and sparse visual instructions as spatial guidance, aiming to achieve precise and intent-faithful image manipulation. To this end, we first construct a textual-visual instruction paired dataset with more than 23K samples derived from dynamic videos, enabling aligned supervision for cross-modal instruction. We then propose TV-Edit, a Textual-Visual instruction unified Editing framework to contextualize drag or point-based visual instructions with image-text semantics and lift them into semantic-aware control representations for pretrained editing backbones. By integrating semantic intent and spatial constraints, TV-Edit leads to more precise spatial control, less instruction ambiguity, and stronger structural consistency than text-only or drag-based alternatives. Finally, we establish TV-Edit-Bench, a deliberately designed benchmark to evaluate semantic faithfulness, spatial alignment, and visual consistency with ground-truth references and controlled textual-visual variations for reliable assessment. Our experiments across multiple editing backbones demonstrate that TV-Edit consistently yields more precise and intent-faithful edits, significantly outperforming state-of-the-art instruction-based and drag-based baselines.
