Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This study introduces an information-theoretic framework for modeling mutual communication between autonomous vehicles (AVs) and human-driven vehicles (HVs) during lane changes, addressing the safety and efficiency issues arising from misinterpretations of intentions. By integrating a level-k Bayesian persuasion game with adaptive communication strategies, the model significantly reduces prediction errors of mandatory lane changes by up to 20% compared to a non-communicative baseline. The findings highlight the importance of inquiry and listening affordances over mere expression, revealing that different drivers exhibit varying preferences for communication styles.
Miscommunication in mixed autonomy driving can be mitigated by a framework that prioritizes inquiry and listening, leading to a 20% reduction in lane change prediction errors.
Mixed autonomy driving becomes unsafe and inefficient when autonomous vehicles (AVs) and human-driven vehicles (HVs) misread each other's intentions. We study this problem as implicit mutual communication in lane changes. The proposed framework models how the ego vehicle both expresses its intent and probes the other driver's preference under epistemic uncertainty. It combines a level-k Bayesian persuasion game with virtual features for proactive signaling, information-theoretic rewards for mutual communication, and adaptive weights of communication affordances. We further introduce the Pride-Inquiry (P-I) and Pride-Prejudice (P-P) planes to analyze communication intensity and tendency. The model is calibrated with a Communication-Based Multi-Agent Inverse Reinforcement Learning algorithm (C-MIRL) on the naturalistic NGSIM dataset. Compared with the non-communicative baseline, the proposed model reduces the prediction error of mandatory lane changes by up to 20% while maintaining strong generalization. Driver-In-the-Loop questionnaire scores are positively correlated with the calibrated communication variables, supporting the subjective validity of the model. The learned rewards further show that inquiry and listening affordances contribute more than pride and expression alone, and that inquiry preference varies more strongly across drivers. These results support explicit modeling of mutual communication and epistemic uncertainty in interactive driving.
