Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This study investigates the effects of intent-based misinformation on the performance of single-agent and multi-agent systems, particularly in high-stakes applications like medical and legal decision-making. The authors demonstrate that misinformation not only degrades the performance of individual agents but also persists through multi-agent interactions, with agents often adopting incorrect answers from misinformed peers. However, the findings reveal that multi-agent debate can mitigate performance degradation, especially when the majority of agents are not misinformed, highlighting the importance of group composition and decision-making protocols in enhancing robustness against misinformation.
Misinformation can persist through multi-agent interactions, but structured debate can significantly reduce its impact on decision-making performance.
Multi-agent systems, in which multiple large language model agents solve problems through turn-based interaction, are increasingly deployed in high-stakes settings such as medical diagnosis, legal analysis, and forensic decision-making. Their reliability can be at risk when single agents reason from incorrect or misleading context, e.g., from tool calls, since errors may propagate through agent interactions. This work studies this risk by injecting intent-based misinformation into benign single-agent and multi-agent systems across reasoning, knowledge, and alignment tasks. We find that misinformation can degrade single-agent performance and persists across multi-agent debate, with agents often retaining answers introduced by misinformed peers. Nevertheless, multi-agent debate reduces the resulting performance degradation compared to single-agent prompting, especially when most agents are not exposed to misinformation. Robustness depends on group composition and decision protocol. Consensus can be more stable than voting under peer pressure, while majorities can often steer misinformed agents back toward correct answers. Our results show that misinformation robustness in multi-agent systems depends on the underlying model and also on how agents exchange information and aggregate decisions.
