Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This study investigates the ability of agentic AI to autonomously generate parallel Julia code for high-performance computing (HPC) using an OpenCode-based agent and a Julia-documentation MCP server. By evaluating three large language models (LLMs) on tasks with varying parallel structures, the research reveals that while the generated code performs well for small inputs, it struggles with larger scales due to issues like deadlocks and oversubscription. The findings highlight that commercial models exhibit comparable performance on certain baselines, yet their agentic implementations reveal critical weaknesses in handling task dependencies and scheduling, underscoring the challenges in achieving robust, scalable code generation for HPC systems.
Agentic AI can generate parallel Julia code, but struggles with scalability and robustness in high-performance computing tasks.
Julia is increasingly used in HPC as a single-language alternative to combining high-level scripting with low-level systems languages, but achieving scalable performance still requires expertise in parallel programming. LLMs are increasingly used for code generation and are advancing rapidly with each new version. Yet, existing studies focus on single-shot prompting rather than agentic settings, in which an LLM autonomously plans, generates, and refines code through tool use. Using an OpenCode-based agent extended with a Julia-documentation MCP server, we study agentic generation of parallel Julia code, focusing on task-based execution with Dagger$.$jl. We evaluate three LLMS, OpenAI GPT-5.5, Anthropic Claude Opus 4.7, and the open-weight Qwen3-Coder-Next, on three problems with distinct parallel structures: Pi approximation, tiled general matrix multiplication, and tiled Cholesky decomposition. The generated Dagger$.$jl implementations are compared against agent-generated Base$.$Threads and MPI$.$jl baselines, with shared-memory experiments scaling to 192 cores and distributed-memory experiments on two nodes. The agents reliably produce executable code for small inputs but fail at larger scales due to deadlocks, oversubscription, or out-of-memory errors, with the open-weight model affected most severely. The two commercial models scale comparably on Base$.$Threads and MPI$.$jl, while their Dagger$.$jl implementations expose recurring weaknesses in task dependencies, granularity, and scheduling. Agentic AI is promising for producing parallel Julia code, but generating robust, performance-aware implementations for large-scale HPC systems remains an open challenge.
