Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces a robust trajectory optimization framework that leverages chance-constrained reinforcement learning to address uncertainty in initial conditions and process noise. By computing a deterministic nominal trajectory offline and applying a structured affine closed-loop correction, the method enhances robustness while maintaining probabilistic feasibility through empirical quantile enforcement and covariance penalties. The framework is validated on two distinct trajectory design problems, demonstrating competitive fuel costs and adaptability across various spacecraft missions despite different uncertainties.
Achieving robust trajectory optimization without sacrificing performance, this framework adapts seamlessly across diverse spacecraft challenges while managing uncertainty effectively.
This paper presents a distribution-agnostic robust trajectory-optimization framework based on chance-constrained reinforcement learning. The uncertainty is represented here through initial conditions and process noise, with the only requirement being that it can be sampled. A deterministic nominal trajectory is first computed offline, and reinforcement learning is then used only to robustify that baseline through a structured affine closed-loop correction law comprising a feedforward control adjustment and time-varying feedback gains. Probabilistic feasibility is enforced empirically through rollout-based upper-tail quantiles, while terminal dispersion is regulated through covariance-feasibility penalties. The framework is assessed on two materially different trajectory design problems. The flagship case study is a three-dimensional multi-impulse Earth-Mars transfer, where the learned policy is benchmarked against a recent robust trajectory-optimization reference under Gaussian uncertainty and then evaluated under bounded uniform uncertainty and under process disturbances not seen during training. The second case study is a stochastic atmospheric pinpoint rocket landing problem, used to assess portability to a short-horizon continuous-thrust setting with drag, mass depletion, and glide-slope constraints. The results show that the proposed framework can remain competitive in upper-tail fuel cost while preserving probabilistic feasibility, and that the same robustification scaffold can be carried across heterogeneous spacecraft trajectory planning problems without redesign of its core stochastic-control structure.
