Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper investigates the causal influence of individual steps in chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning within large language models by employing early exit techniques to identify a critical transition point known as the "commitment boundary." The authors reveal that reasoning often stabilizes into a high-confidence answer after just one step, with subsequent CoT steps being epiphenomenal and not affecting the final answer probability. By leveraging attention probes, they demonstrate that these answer-formation stages can be accurately decoded from intermediate steps, allowing for a significant reduction in the length of CoTs without compromising performance.
Reasoning in large language models often stabilizes into a high-confidence answer after just one step, rendering many subsequent reasoning steps unnecessary.
Chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning is the dominant paradigm for inference-time scaling in language models, yet the causal influence of individual steps on the final answer poorly understood. We estimate each step's causal importance via early exit and use this measure to study how answers form across the reasoning traces of several model families. Across diverse tasks, we find that reasoning typically crosses a \emph{commitment boundary} -- a sharp transition from transient intermediate guesses to a stable, high-confidence answer. This transition often happens in a single step, well before the model's reasoning block ends, and is followed by \emph{epiphenomenal} CoT steps that leave the final answer probability unaltered. Using attention probes, we show that answer-formation stages can be linearly decoded from intermediate reasoning steps with high accuracy and generalize robustly to unseen reasoning tasks. We exploit this signal to early-exit reasoning blocks at the commitment boundary, reducing the length of CoTs up to 55\% on average with negligible impact on model performance.
