Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This study benchmarks four commercial depth sensors鈥擨ntel RealSense D405, PMD Flexx2, Stereolabs ZED 2i, and Zivid 2M+ 60鈥攁gainst various medical phantoms to assess their accuracy in real-world scenarios. The evaluation focuses on challenging conditions such as homogeneous surfaces, specular reflections, and subsurface scattering, using stylus-sampled references for precision. Results indicate that the Zivid 2M+ 60 outperformed the other sensors across all tested objects, highlighting its potential for medical applications, while the ZED 2i showed mixed performance depending on the type of specimen.
The Zivid 2M+ 60 outshines its competitors, proving to be the most accurate depth sensor for medical applications in challenging conditions.
Depth estimation has numerous medical and surgical applications. We benchmark four depth sensors on a porcine bone specimen, a porcine belly specimen, and a silicone kidney phantom using stylus-sampled references. These objects contain several real-world challenges, including homogeneous surfaces, specular surfaces, and subsurface scattering. The comparison includes stereo, structured-light, and time-of-flight sensors at a distance of approximately 50 cm. Specifically, the Intel RealSense D405 (Intel RealSense, United States), PMD Flexx2 (pmdtechnologies, Germany), Stereolabs ZED 2i (Stereolabs, France), and Zivid 2M+ 60 (Zivid, Norway) are compared. The Zivid 2M+ 60 performed best across all objects and metrics considered in this work. The ZED ranked second for real tissue, but last on the phantom.
