Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper addresses the vulnerabilities in AI-assisted peer review processes, particularly focusing on the risks posed by multimodal inputs, such as figures and text, in scientific papers. The authors introduce PaperGuard, a comprehensive benchmark that evaluates and defends against targeted, domain-specific attacks on AI peer reviewers, revealing that current models are significantly susceptible to manipulation. Through extensive experiments, they demonstrate the effectiveness of their proposed defenses, establishing a crucial framework for enhancing the robustness of AI in scholarly reviewing.
AI peer reviewers are alarmingly vulnerable to targeted multimodal attacks, with existing defenses falling short in the face of sophisticated adversarial strategies.
The integration of Large Language Models (LLMs) and Multimodal LLMs (MLLMs) into scientific peer-review workflows introduces novel and significant risks for adversarial manipulation, especially given the multimodal nature of scientific papers where figures, not just text, convey core evidence. This creates a significant gap: current robustness studies on AI peer-review are overwhelmingly text-only. Moreover, the problem is distinct from standard jailbreaking, as a peer-review attack seeks to induce a domain-specific, targeted failure (e.g., "inflate this score") rather than a general safety policy violation, for which no practical defenses exist. To address this, we introduce PaperGuard, the first comprehensive benchmark designed to systematically evaluate and defend AI-generated peer-review against these domain-specific, cross-modal attacks. Our framework is built on three pillars: (1) a new multimodal peer-review dataset spanning multiple scientific domains; (2) a unified suite of attacks, including black-box prompt injections and white-box perturbations, specifically designed to target both text (GCG) and figures (PGD); and (3) a practical defense, motivated by the long-context challenge of academic papers, that uses chunk-based embedding search to efficiently localize and mitigate harmful instructions. Our extensive experiments, conducted across state-of-the-art models, confirm that AI reviewers are pervasively vulnerable. PaperGuard establishes the foundational benchmark, protocols, and actionable defense necessary to pioneer trustworthy, attack-resilient AI-assisted scholarly reviewing.
