Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces a path-based credibility evaluation framework for simulated rainfall in autonomous-driving perception tests, addressing the limitations of traditional nominal intensity measurements that fail to capture real-world rainfall dynamics. By utilizing real rainfall's drop size and velocity distributions as a reference, the method quantifies the effectiveness of different simulated rainfall paths through metrics like path-equivalent rainfall intensity and Realism of Raindrop Distribution (RRD) scores. Experimental results highlight the superiority of specific paths, revealing significant spatial non-uniformity in perception outcomes and underscoring the importance of a more nuanced evaluation approach for reliable automated driving assessments.
Spatial non-uniformity in simulated rainfall can skew perception tests, but a new path-based evaluation method reveals which conditions yield the most reliable results for autonomous driving.
Credible simulated-rainfall conditions are essential for identifying perception-system boundaries and supporting SOTIF-oriented risk assessment in automated driving. However, closed-field tests are often described only by nominal rainfall intensity or single-point measurements, making it difficult to align simulated rain fields with real rainfall and map test results to real-world scenarios. This paper proposes a path-based credibility evaluation method for simulated rainfall in autonomous-driving perception tests. Using the drop size and velocity joint distribution of real rainfall as the reference, each candidate path is represented by path-equivalent rainfall intensity, an uncertainty band, and a path-averaged Realism of Raindrop Distribution (RRD) score. Lidar target point-cloud count and mean reflectivity are further used for perception-consistency correction, quantifying the proxy capability of each simulated-rainfall path for real-rainfall perception effects. Experiments are conducted using about 10,000 real-rainfall raindrop-spectrum samples, 728 RainSense perception samples, and 45 spatial sampling points in a 2.4 m x 7.2 m simulated-rainfall area. Results show that spatial non-uniformity remains under the same nominal condition, confirming the need for path-based evaluation. The method identifies Path IV and Path VI as preferable candidates, with results of 11.54 +/- 0.31 mm/h, RRD = 0.43, and 8.28 +/- 0.34 mm/h, RRD = 0.46, respectively. These paths show more balanced performance in rainfall-intensity stability, raindrop-spectrum realism, and perception consistency. The proposed method supports path selection, condition description, and credible interpretation of autonomous-driving perception tests under rainfall.
