Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper explores the critical distinctions between aleatoric and epistemic uncertainty in the context of dynamical systems, an area that has been underexplored in machine learning. By identifying the specific uncertainties required for effective modeling in dynamical systems, the authors clarify the sources and nature of these uncertainties and how they influence various tasks. The findings highlight the importance of tailoring uncertainty representation to the objectives of different dynamical system applications, potentially enhancing predictive performance and robustness.
Understanding the right types of uncertainty for dynamical systems could revolutionize how we model and predict complex behaviors in AI.
The distinction between aleatoric and epistemic uncertainty has received considerable attention in machine learning research, mainly in the context of supervised learning but also in other settings such as generative modeling. In this paper, we offer a machine learning perspective on uncertainty modeling for dynamical systems, which has been studied much less so far. In particular, we ask: what uncertainties do we need for dynamical systems? We discuss sources of uncertainty, clarify their nature (aleatoric or epistemic), and consider how the objectives of representing and quantifying uncertainty vary across different tasks.
