Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces a novel approach to forecasting the behavior of large reasoning models (LRMs) by treating behavior forecasting as a learnable task, eliminating the need for traditional explanation methods. By training Behavior Forecasters on data generated through querying the LRM, the authors demonstrate that these forecasters can accurately predict model behavior, such as answer repetition and input alteration effects, using a single forward pass. The results show that these forecasters outperform established models like GPT-5.4 and Claude Opus-4.6 in accuracy while being significantly more efficient in inference cost.
Behavior Forecasters can predict LRM behavior more accurately than leading models while slashing inference costs.
Trust in an AI system is often anchored by explanations of how it works, which one then uses to forecast its behavior on new inputs. For large reasoning models (LRMs), this conventional route is particularly difficult to follow: explanation methods for single token generations do not naturally generalize to long trajectories, and the trajectories themselves are often not faithful when read as natural language. We propose an alternative that bypasses the explanation step: treat behavior forecasting as a learnable task and train Behavior Forecasters that operates on a single reasoning trajectory to make the same forecasts one would typically seek from an explanation. The forecaster's training data is obtained by querying the LRM with no human annotation, and its inference is done in a single forward pass. We instantiate this approach on two tasks: how likely the LRM is to repeat its answer on re-runs, and how removing parts of the input changes its answer. We evaluate this approach on both tasks across three diverse reasoning datasets and find that trained Behavior Forecasters are more accurate than GPT-5.4 and Claude Opus-4.6 reading the same trajectories as naive readers, at a small fraction of their inference cost. We find that fine-tuning the backbone end-to-end and initializing it from the target LRM are each necessary for strong performance. These results show that the reasoning trajectory carries information about the LRM's future behavior that goes beyond what naive reading conveys.
