Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This study investigates the impact of academic naming policies on citation accuracy and researcher well-being, particularly for scholars who change their names due to marriage, gender transition, or other reasons. Utilizing a mixed-methods approach, including surveys, interviews, and citation analysis across eight major computer science venues, the authors reveal that venues with accessible name change policies experience significantly fewer citation errors. The research highlights the mental health implications of citation inaccuracies, showing a 92% decrease in deadnaming of transgender researchers from 2019 to 2024, underscoring the critical need for inclusive publishing practices.
Citation errors stemming from name changes can lead to significant mental health challenges for researchers, but inclusive policies can drastically reduce these issues.
In academic publishing, names connect scholars to their work. When scholars change their names, including for marriage, academic recognition, or gender transition, they may lose credit for past publications. However, despite significant impacts on citation accuracy and researcher well-being, no existing studies examine how naming policies in computer science serve researchers who change their names. We use a mixed-methods approach combining surveys, interviews, and large-scale citation analysis of papers from eight major computer science venues from 2019-2025. We document the multi-year advocacy effort that established the first name change policies, identify implementation barriers including incomplete publisher updates and months-long processing delays. Researchers continue being cited with misparsed and incorrect names despite publisher updates. When these citation errors happen, interviewees report significant mental health impacts, including stress, anxiety, and safety risks. Empirically, we find that venues with accessible and visible name change policies have significantly fewer citation errors compared to inaccessible policies (899 vs. 996 errors per 1,000 papers). Our annotation analysis shows that deadnaming of transgender researchers in citations decreased by 92% from 2019 to 2024. Our findings demonstrate the importance of inclusive publishing policies, for which name change policy advocacy led by trans researchers has been a significant driver. We recommend that venues adopt proactive visible name change policies, support queer advocacy groups, and improve publication infrastructure to build an inclusive publishing landscape. The accompanied toolkit to check errors in bibliographic latex file is available here https://github.com/pranav-ust/cite-updater.
CMU ML