Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This study evaluates the performance of seven frontier Large Language Models (LLMs) on a standardized Office proficiency exam, specifically designed to assess their document-automation capabilities in a complex, multi-application environment. The evaluation, based on China's National Computer Rank Examination, reveals that even the most advanced models score only 36.6% in single-turn tasks, while a more sophisticated agentic system with feedback and iterative repair achieves 68.8%, still falling short of the community reference score of 95.5%. These findings highlight the significant limitations of current LLMs in executing fine-grained Office document automation, despite advancements in related technologies.
LLMs struggle with Office automation, scoring only 36.6% on a standardized proficiency exam, revealing a critical gap in their capabilities.
The deployment of Large Language Model (LLM) agents for computer automation is accelerating, yet their ability to navigate complex, professional-grade productivity software is largely untested. We argue that Office automation is an ideal environment for benchmarking document-automation capability, as it requires long-horizon planning and reasoning, precise parameter configuration, and multi-application integration. To quantify this capability, we introduce an evaluation based on China's National Computer Rank Examination (NCRE), featuring 200 comprehensive practical-operation tasks across Word, Excel, and PowerPoint. Each task is scored on a 100-point rubric scale using 7,118 machine-gradable criteria, and Score Rate (SR) denotes the mean percentage of rubric points earned across these tasks. We benchmark 7 frontier LLMs and observe stark limitations: single-turn models score a maximum of 36.6%. A stronger agentic system with execution feedback, iterative repair, and broader Office automation access reaches 68.8%, but remains below the 95.5% community-reference score used as a scoring sanity check. Ultimately, our experiments demonstrate that despite recent advancements in code generation, achieving reliable fine-grained Office document automation remains a significant challenge for current code-generating LLM and agent systems.