Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces a novel framework for explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) that enhances the interpretability of AI/ML models in network operations by utilizing a moderately sized large language model (LLM) alongside mutual feature interaction data. By generating human-understandable natural language explanations, the framework addresses the limitations of existing XAI techniques that often produce overly technical outputs. Empirical evaluations on an optical quality of transmission (QoT) estimation use case demonstrate that this approach improves explanation usefulness and scope by 12.2% and 6.2%, respectively, while achieving an impressive correctness rate of 97.5%.
Human-understandable explanations for AI decisions can be achieved by augmenting traditional XAI methods with LLMs and mutual feature interactions, leading to significantly improved interpretability.
As artificial intelligence and machine learning (AI/ML) models become integral to network operations, their lack of transparency poses a significant barrier to operator trust. Existing explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) techniques often fail to bridge this gap for non-specialists, producing technical outputs that are difficult to translate into actionable insights. This paper presents a framework specifically designed to address this shortcoming. It leverages a moderately sized large language model (LLM) and extends beyond the standard use of SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) feature influence values. The framework employs a structured prompt enriched with mutual feature interaction data to generate human-understandable natural language explanations. To validate our framework, we performed an empirical evaluation on an optical quality of transmission (QoT) estimation use case with human evaluators. We collected independent performance evaluations from specialists, which showed a high inter-evaluator agreement. Compared to a state-of-the-art baseline that uses only SHAP feature influence values in a straightforward prompt, our approach improves the explanation usefulness and scope by 12.2% and 6.2%, while achieving 97.5% correctness.
