Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This study conducts a large-scale semantic analysis of learner agency and autonomy by extracting and examining nearly 9,000 definitions and 2,700 scale items from over 14,000 publications. The findings reveal that these constructs can be understood through three distinct dimensions: regulation and control of learning, intrinsic motivation and decision-making, and social-relational action, highlighting the prevalence of a jingle-jangle fallacy in the literature. Notably, the research indicates that existing measurement scales underrepresent the sociocultural dimension, which has significant implications for the design of AI-mediated learning environments that aim to foster comprehensive learner agency.
Current AI research in education overlooks the critical sociocultural dimension of learner agency, risking a narrow focus in AI-mediated learning environments.
Learner agency and autonomy are foundational to personal development, yet a pervasive "jingle-jangle" fallacy (i.e. identical terms denoting different constructs, distinct terms denoting identical ones) has substantially hindered cumulative knowledge. Treating meaning as a phenomenon constituted through use in linguistic practice, we extracted 8,954 definitions and 2,700 scale items from over 14,000 publications, to investigate how researchers actually used learner agency and autonomy with a semantic analysis pipeline. The definitional landscape of two constructs resolves into three dimensions: regulation and control of learning (task), intrinsic motivation and internal decision-making (person), and social-relational action (sociocultural), thereby empirically quantifying the jingle-jangle fallacy. Existing scales, however, systematically underrepresent the sociocultural dimension. Critically, current generative AI research in education concentrates on learning regulation and control, narrowing the behavioral repertoire that AI-mediated learning environments are designed to cultivate. Beyond conceptual clarification, this work carries direct implications for conceptualization, measurement, and practice towards supporting the multidimensional learner agency and autonomy.
Tsinghua AI