Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This study investigates the stability of long-horizon autoregressive forecasting for oscillatory physical signals, specifically using synthetic seismograms as a testbed with the \textsc{SeismoGPT} model. By conducting controlled ablations, the authors identify that multi-token prediction significantly enhances stability, while also revealing that performance sharply declines when the context-ratio falls below one. The findings highlight a critical limitation in current forecasting methods, particularly concerning polarity inversion, suggesting that future work should focus on phase-aware objectives to improve accuracy.
Multi-token prediction is the key to stabilizing long-horizon forecasts of oscillatory signals, revealing a threshold where traditional methods fail.
Long-horizon autoregressive forecasting of oscillatory physical signals, such as seismograms, gravitational-wave strain, and similar wavefields is limited by error accumulation: as a causal model is fed its own outputs over hundreds of steps, small per-step errors compound into phase drift that pointwise metrics fail to detect. We ask when such rollout stays stable, using synthetic three-component seismograms as a physically structured testbed and the \textsc{SeismoGPT} autoregressive forecaster as the model under study. Through controlled, intra-architecture ablations evaluated on free-running rollout with paired significance tests, we isolate the contribution of each design choice. Multi-token prediction is the dominant stabilizer, accounting for almost the entire improvement over a single-token baseline ($+0.040$ median NCC); a horizon-embedding hybrid prediction head and a cross-horizon STFT-magnitude coherence loss each add a small but consistent further gain. Performance depends sharply on a context-ratio threshold near one, roughly the full P-S interval of observed signal, below which rollout generalization collapses. The dominant residual failure is a polarity inversion that a magnitude-based spectral loss cannot, by construction, penalize, identifying phase-aware objectives as the natural next step. We frame this as a controlled study of rollout stability on oscillatory wavefields, not a benchmark of forecasting architectures.
BAIR