Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper argues for the establishment of a new normative infrastructure to support the agentic web, where AI agents operate on behalf of users. It highlights the current barriers posed by outdated regulations and platform policies that hinder the effective functioning of these agents, often conflating them with malicious bots. The authors advocate for a societal dialogue to develop principles and policies that facilitate user empowerment through AI agents while balancing other legitimate interests.
Outdated laws are stifling the potential of AI agents, which could revolutionize user interaction with the internet.
The agentic web, in which users interact with the internet largely through agents acting on their behalf, is now technically feasible. However, many of the consumer and social benefits that could be realized by online AI agents acting scrupulously in their principals' interest are currently obstructed by outdated laws, terms of service, and other less formal practices which allow online platforms to block and degrade agent access, often in secret. No distinction is currently drawn between "malicious bots" and AI agents acting with the express delegated authority of a user. For the agentic web to realize its promise, it needs not only the technical infrastructure of protocols and interfaces, but the normative infrastructure of a broadly-accepted and socially-beneficial set of laws, norms and practices governing agentic access to online properties. Building that normative infrastructure requires a society-wide conversation. This paper aims to help precipitate that conversation, to identify normative principles that can guide it, and to advocate for policies that enable users' appropriately delegated agents to act online on their behalf, with as few curbs on their doing so as is reasonable given the other legitimate interests at stake.
