Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper explores the integration of foundation models in robots designed for patient and elderly care, highlighting their potential for flexible communication and personalized assistance. While current systems show promise in usability and engagement, they face significant challenges such as reliability issues and limited evidence of clinical impact. The authors advocate for the establishment of care-specific evaluation standards and improved integration into care workflows to enhance the effectiveness of these technologies in real-world settings.
Despite promising engagement benefits, foundation model-based care robots struggle with reliability and lack robust evidence for clinical impact.
Demand for older-adult and patient care is growing rapidly as populations age worldwide. Foundation models are increasingly being integrated into robots and interactive agents, with the promise of more flexible communication and personalized assistance. However, care settings require reliable and workflow-compatible systems with accountable human oversight, and it remains unclear whether current embodied systems can translate technical advances into clinical impact. This Perspective synthesizes foundation model-based care robots across three areas: design features, user experience, and evidence for care-related outcomes. Current systems most commonly use foundation models as conversational and reasoning layers within voice-centered socially assistive embodiments, while multimodal grounding and physical autonomy remain limited. Empirical evaluations report positive usability and engagement benefits, but reliability failures persist across the interaction pipeline such as hallucinations and conversational breakdowns. Evidence for care impact remains concentrated in proximal outcomes such as cognitive engagement and participation, with limited evidence for validated clinical or care-related changes. We argue that future research should transition toward care-specific evaluation standards, accountable autonomy, and integration into care workflows to support more responsive and responsible care technologies.
MIT CSAIL