Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper provides a comprehensive analysis of how Large Language Models (LLMs) are transforming research practices across various academic disciplines, highlighting their potential to accelerate workflows in hypothesis generation, literature synthesis, data analysis, and scientific writing. However, it also identifies significant challenges such as hallucination, reproducibility issues, and biases in datasets, alongside ten underexplored systemic risks like erosion of researcher autonomy and AI-driven confirmation bias. The findings underscore the urgent need for interdisciplinary governance frameworks and enhanced validation standards to responsibly integrate LLMs into scientific research.
LLMs are not just tools; they are reshaping the very fabric of research, but they also introduce systemic risks that could undermine scientific integrity.
Large Language Models (LLMs) are rapidly reshaping academic research across the natural sciences, social sciences, and humanities, yet the scientific community lacks a comprehensive, cross-disciplinary account of how these tools are being integrated, what they deliver, and where they fall short. This paper addresses that gap by mapping their current state and outlining an agenda for their responsible integration into scientific research. Our analysis reveals a consistent pattern: LLMs meaningfully accelerate research workflows -- from hypothesis generation and literature synthesis to data analysis and scientific writing -- while introducing serious challenges related to hallucination, reproducibility, dataset bias, and model opacity. Beyond technical limitations, we identify ten underexplored challenges, including the erosion of researcher autonomy, AI-driven confirmation bias, authorship ambiguity, and unequal access to these technologies -- systemic risks that demand interdisciplinary governance frameworks, robust validation standards, and expanded explainability research.
