Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces PaperFlow, a novel framework for scientific paper recommendation that operates through three interconnected stages: Profiling, Recommending, and Adapting, which collectively address the dynamic nature of scientific reading. By establishing a longitudinal user-day benchmark and employing a blind human-evaluation protocol, the authors validate the efficacy of PaperFlow against five existing baselines. The results demonstrate that PaperFlow not only achieves superior oracle-based rankings but also aligns closely with user behavior and expert evaluations, highlighting its potential to enhance personalized scholarly engagement.
PaperFlow redefines scientific paper recommendation by adapting to user interests over time, achieving unmatched alignment with real-world reading behaviors.
Scientific paper recommendation is typically evaluated as static ranking over a fixed candidate set, yet real scientific reading unfolds as a daily, longitudinal process in which interests shift and feedback accumulates. We introduce PaperFlow, a framework that organizes it into three coupled stages: Profiling, which constructs and maintains a structured, inspectable scholarly profile from heterogeneous cold-start evidence; Recommending, which ranks each date-specific paper stream through multi-signal aggregation under a fixed display budget; and Adapting, which updates user state from semantically distinct feedback signals and models interest drift across days. We further define a longitudinal user-day benchmark that fixes users, dates, candidate pools, visible inputs, and hidden simulated relevance labels under a shared temporal information boundary. The benchmark contains 24 simulated research users, 50 daily paper streams, 1,200 user-day episodes, 20,727 unique papers, and 497,448 episode-paper records. We additionally specify a blind human-evaluation protocol to validate alignment between automatic metrics and expert judgments. Experiments against five scientific recommendation baselines show that PaperFlow achieves the strongest oracle-based ranking, the highest behavioral alignment with simulated reading selections, and the best blind human-evaluation score.
