Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This study investigates whether active exploration can mitigate the "conjunctive handicap" observed in adult causal reasoning, where individuals struggle to identify conjunctive rules compared to disjunctive ones. Utilizing a modified "blicket detector" task, the authors demonstrate that allowing adults to actively explore significantly enhances their ability to reason about conjunctive causal relationships, although they still require more interventions than for disjunctive rules. Additionally, the performance of various large language models (LLMs) is compared, revealing that while some models achieve near-human accuracy in hypothesis inference, they lag in exploration efficiency and exhibit similar performance gaps as humans in conjunctive versus disjunctive tasks.
Active exploration can dramatically enhance adults' ability to reason about complex causal relationships, but even with this advantage, they still struggle compared to simpler tasks.
A long-standing finding in the causal learning literature is that adults struggle to identify conjunctive causal rules, where an effect requires the simultaneous presence of multiple causes, while performing better in disjunctive settings. However, most demonstrations of this ``conjunctive handicap'' rely on passive observation paradigms with limited evidence, where learners have no control over evidence generation. This paper asks whether this bias persists when adults are granted agency through active exploration. Using a modified ``blicket detector'' task, adult participants freely intervened to identify causal objects under conjunctive or disjunctive rule structures. We show that active exploration substantially improves adults' conjunctive causal reasoning, although conjunctive rules still require more tests to infer than disjunctive rules. We further compare human performance to a range of large language models in the same setting. While some state-of-the-art models approach human-level performance on hypothesis inference accuracy, they often exhibit less efficient exploration strategies and similar conjunctive-disjunctive performance gaps.
BAIR
Mila
MIT CSAIL