Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This study examines the neglect-zero effect, a cognitive bias in humans where zero-models are overlooked, and investigates how large language models (LLMs) process inferences related to this bias. Using a structural priming paradigm, the authors compare LLM responses to primes that enforce consideration of zero-models against those that do not. The findings indicate that the analyzed LLMs do not exhibit the neglect-zero effect, suggesting a divergence from human cognitive processing in this context.
LLMs may completely bypass the neglect-zero effect, challenging assumptions about their alignment with human cognitive biases.
We investigate the extent to which the language processing of LLMs resembles human cognitive processes, focusing on a human cognitive bias called the $\textit{neglect-zero effect}$. This effect refers to the human tendency to ignore $\textit{zero-models}$, which are configurations that render a proposition vacuously true by virtue of an empty set. We focus on two types of inferences driven by the neglect-zero effect, and examine how LLMs process these inferences by comparing their behavior with that in an inference that does not involve the neglect-zero effect. For this purpose, we employ a paradigm based on $\textit{structural priming}$, where recent exposure to a preceding sentence (the $\textit{prime}$) facilitates the processing of a subsequent sentence (the $\textit{target}$) due to their structural similarity. We prepare primes to force LLMs to consider the zero-model, and analyze whether they also consider it in the target. The results suggest that the neglect-zero effect may not occur in the LLMs analyzed in this study. Our code is available at https://github.com/ynklab/neglect_zero
