Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper investigates the trustworthiness of generative models in inverse problems, particularly in medical imaging, by analyzing how fixed measurement operators can differentiate between plausible reconstructions supported by measurements and those filled in by the generative prior. The authors introduce a local measurement-manifold compatibility measure that quantifies the operator's ability to observe relevant tangent directions, proving its influence on reconstruction error and guiding improved measurement strategies. Their approach demonstrates that posterior-cloud measurement design can significantly enhance sampling efficiency in various imaging scenarios, outperforming traditional non-learned methods.
A new measurement-manifold compatibility measure reveals how to improve generative model trustworthiness in medical imaging by guiding more effective sampling strategies.
Generative models are increasingly used as priors for inverse problems, but their ability to produce realistic images creates a basic trust problem: a plausible reconstruction may be supported by the measurements, or it may be filled in by the prior along unobserved directions. This distinction is especially important in medical imaging, where acquisition operators are designed under scan-time, dose, and calibration constraints. We study generative inverse problems from a measurement-geometry perspective. The central question is whether a fixed measurement operator can distinguish nearby images that are plausible under the generative prior, and whether this relationship can guide better measurements. We introduce a local measurement-manifold compatibility measure that quantifies how well the operator observes prior-relevant tangent directions. Under local regularity assumptions, we prove that this quantity controls the stable part of the reconstruction error, while the generative prior controls off-manifold drift. This worst-direction certificate motivates practical fixed and sequential acquisition rules based on overall local volume preservation, including a posterior-cloud design that adapts measurements at test time without training a sampling policy. Across row-sampling, tomographic, and MR acquisition settings, the proposed scores predict failure modes, explain measurement-induced hallucinations, and guide better sampling. In fastMRI Cartesian sampling, posterior-cloud measurement design improves over strong non-learned ACS-preserving baselines, including variable-density and Poisson-like masks.
