Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces EES-CND, a fault-tolerant service placement approach that utilizes collaborative neural decision-making to enhance service delivery in edge-cloud environments. By employing multiple lightweight neural networks that adaptively update online through an enhanced evolution strategy, the method effectively addresses performance drift and system dynamics during failure events. The results demonstrate a significant improvement in service recovery time and reliability, achieving a 44.8% reduction in fault-tolerance costs compared to existing standalone models.
EES-CND reduces fault-tolerance costs by nearly 45% while dramatically improving service recovery times in complex edge-cloud systems.
The edge-cloud paradigm improves service delivery by orchestrating resources across edge nodes and cloud data centres. These environments consist of heterogeneous, interconnected computing nodes that cooperate to deliver continuous services. However, their scale and complexity increase vulnerability to failures from hardware malfunctions, software defects, and dynamic operating conditions. These failures can disrupt system configurations and service execution, leading to reduced reliability, performance degradation, and violations of service-level objectives. Ensuring service execution requires adaptive service placement strategies across edge-cloud resources. This study introduces a fault-tolerant service placement approach (Enhanced Evolution Strategy for Collaborative Neural Decision-making, EES-CND) for edge-cloud environments. The method employs collaborative decision-making, wherein multiple lightweight neural networks jointly infer redeployment strategies during failure events. To address the system dynamics and mitigate performance drift, adaptive models are updated online using an enhanced evolution strategy. Extensive simulations show that EES-CND effectively handles performance drift and significantly outperforms existing methods in service recovery time, response time, and reliability, achieving a 44.8\% reduction in fault-tolerance cost compared to standalone models.
