Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper addresses the theoretical guarantees for a drift estimator introduced by Tapia Costa et al. (2026), which treats drift estimation in stochastic differential equations as a denoising problem using score-matching diffusion models. By deriving an explicit risk bound for the time-averaged mean-squared error, the authors decompose the risk into components related to discretization, score approximation, noise initialization, and sampling variance. The findings reveal critical trade-offs among hyperparameters and sources of error, enhancing the understanding of the estimator's performance and reliability.
The derived risk bounds expose the intricate trade-offs in drift estimation, clarifying how different error sources interact and impact performance.
Parameter estimation in stochastic differential equations is a classical statistical problem of much importance in many scientific fields. Recent work of Tapia Costa et al. (2026) introduced a novel technique for estimating the drift when the diffusion parameter is known, using discrete samples from multiple trajectories. Their method treats drift estimation as a denoising problem, and leverages tools from (conditional) score-matching diffusion models. Although their experiments showed promising results across different drift classes, the question of theoretical guarantees for their estimator was left unanswered. In this note, we address this gap by exploiting techniques from diffusion model theory. More concretely, we derive an explicit risk bound for the time-averaged mean-squared error of said drift estimator. Our bound decomposes the risk into the (i) Euler-Maruyama discretization, (ii) score/denoiser approximation, (iii) noise initialization, and (iv) sampling variance, revealing the trade-offs between the different hyperparameters and sources of error in the estimator.
