Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces a unified categorical framework that integrates event calculus, ensemble formation, and game-theoretic reward structures within a Grothendieck topos, addressing the need for strategic optimization in multi-agent systems. By defining a novel concept of a game sheaf, the authors establish a connection between Nash equilibria and global sections of a derived best-response correspondence sheaf, while also identifying cohomological obstructions that signify strategic inconsistencies. A case study on immunological defense scenarios illustrates the framework's capability to model complex interactions among heterogeneous agents under resource constraints, highlighting its potential for developing economically rational multi-agent systems.
Nash equilibria emerge as global sections in a new categorical framework, revealing deep connections between strategic choice and geometric consensus.
The coordination of heterogeneous autonomous agents in dynamic, adversarial environments requires simultaneous satisfaction of geometric constraints, logical consistency, temporal reasoning, and strategic optimization. Existing sheaf- and topos-theoretic frameworks provide powerful tools for geometric consensus, knowledge alignment, and causal planning, but lack explicit models for value, reward, and strategic choice. This report presents a unified categorical framework that integrates event calculus, SCEL-like ensemble formation, and game-theoretic reward structures into a single Grothendieck topos of time-space histories. We introduce the notion of a \emph{game sheaf} whose stalks contain utility functions and policy distributions, and restriction maps encode both parallel transport and best-response dynamics. We prove that Nash equilibria correspond to global sections of a derived best-response correspondence sheaf, while cohomological obstructions classify failures of strategic consistency. A detailed case study of an immunological ``bastion defense''scenario -- heterogeneous agents forming attack/defense ensembles under resource constraints -- demonstrates the framework's expressiveness. This synthesis provides a rigorous foundation for verifiable, autonomic, and economically rational multi-agent systems.
