Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
The paper introduces GASP, a framework for injecting 3D spatial priors into VLMs by training a correspondence head with a dual objective: a contrastive loss on point correspondences for view-invariance and a depth consistency supervision to resolve geometric ambiguities. This approach significantly improves internal correspondence matching accuracy within the VLM, boosting peak layer-wise correspondence to over 70% and maintaining over 85% temporal robustness. Consequently, GASP achieves substantial gains on downstream spatial reasoning benchmarks without requiring training on 3D VQA data, demonstrating the effectiveness of learning from fundamental geometric priors.
Forget task-specific fine-tuning – teaching VLMs basic geometry yields a +29% boost on spatial reasoning benchmarks.
Vision-Language Models (VLMs) often struggle with robust 3D spatial reasoning. Prevailing methods that rely on fine-tuning with 3D visual question-answering (VQA) datasets may overfit dataset-specific biases, while integrating specialized 3D visual encoders is often inflexible and cumbersome. In this paper, we argue that genuine spatial understanding should emerge from learning fundamental geometric priors, not only from high-level VQA supervision. We propose GASP (Geometric-Aware Spatial Priors), a framework that injects these priors directly into the LLM's transformer layers. GASP employs a small correspondence head, applied as a deep supervision signal across all layers, and is trained with a dual objective leveraging ground-truth geometry from large-scale video scenes: a contrastive loss on ground-truth point correspondences enforces 2D view-invariance, while a depth consistency supervision resolves 3D geometric ambiguities. Our analysis first provides a diagnostic showing that standard VLMs'internal correspondence matching accuracy is very low (often below 5%). We then demonstrate that our training substantially improves this behavior, boosting peak layer-wise correspondence to over 70% and maintaining over 85% temporal robustness while baselines remain below 5%. These internal improvements translate to significant gains on downstream spatial benchmarks including +18.2% on All-Angles Bench and +29.0% on VSI-Bench, all without training on any 3D VQA data. Our findings indicate that learning from fundamental geometric priors is a promising and generalizable pathway towards VLMs with more reliable 3D spatial reasoning.