Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper formalizes and evaluates _marker internal confidence_ (MIC), the intrinsic confidence an LLM associates with specific epistemic markers. They introduce seven metrics to assess the stability of MICs within and across distributions, testing whether LLMs can consistently map markers to confidence levels. Results show that LLMs exhibit miscalibration even when interpreting markers in a model-centric way, struggling to differentiate markers by internal confidence across different tasks, despite maintaining a consistent ranking order.
LLMs can't reliably map linguistic uncertainty markers (like "likely" or "possibly") to their own internal confidence levels across different tasks, even when you let them define what those markers mean.
LLMs' linguistically expressed confidence should faithfully reflect their intrinsic uncertainty. While recent work shows LLMs struggle to use epistemic markers (e.g., "it is likely...") in a human-aligned fashion, it remains unclear whether models can apply their own linguistic confidence framework to associate markers with specific confidence levels in a stable and generalizable way, and how contextual features impact this ability. We conduct the first systematic study of this question, formalizing _marker internal confidence_ (MIC) as the estimated intrinsic confidence a model associates with a specific epistemic marker in a given task domain. We present 7 metrics to evaluate the stability of MICs within and across distributions. Applying our analysis framework to diverse models and tasks, we find that LLMs remain faithfully miscalibrated even under model-centric interpretation of marker meanings, struggling to differentiate markers by internal confidence across distributions despite preserving a somewhat consistent ranking order across tasks. This supplies critical, complementary evidence to existing work toward a holistic understanding of faithful calibration in LLMs, emphasizing the need for more aligned and stable marker use to improve trustworthiness and reliability.
