Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces a Cognitive Taxonomy, derived from cognitive science, that decomposes general intelligence into 10 key cognitive faculties to provide a structured framework for AGI evaluation. It proposes a rigorous evaluation protocol using targeted, held-out cognitive tasks to generate a 'cognitive profile' of a system's capabilities. The aim is to move beyond subjective AGI claims and enable empirical tracking of progress, facilitating responsible governance.
Forget vague AGI claims – this cognitive taxonomy provides a concrete, measurable framework to map AI capabilities against human cognitive abilities.
Despite widespread discussion of AGI, there is no clear framework for measuring progress toward it. This ambiguity fuels subjective claims, makes it difficult to track progress, and risks hindering responsible governance. As a starting point to address this gap, we present a framework for understanding system capabilities in relation to human cognitive abilities. Drawing from decades of research in psychology, neuroscience, and cognitive science, we introduce a Cognitive Taxonomy that deconstructs general intelligence into 10 key cognitive faculties. We then propose a rigorous evaluation protocol in which a system's performance is measured across a suite of targeted, held-out cognitive tasks, generating a 'cognitive profile' that can be used to understand a system's strengths and weaknesses. We hope this framework will provide a practical roadmap and an initial step toward more rigorous, empirical evaluation of AGI.
DeepMind
Stanford HAI