Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
The paper introduces MeniOmni, a new multimodal benchmark dataset for meniscus injury assessment, comprising 746 MRI studies with volumetric inputs, clinical priors, and expert-annotated clinical text. It defines two tasks: fine-grained Stoller severity grading and diagnostic report generation, along with risk-aware ordinal evaluation metrics. Baseline experiments demonstrate that incorporating clinical priors improves grading performance and reduces severe errors, emphasizing the importance of multimodal context.
Current knee MRI benchmarks miss the holistic clinical picture; MeniOmni fills this gap with multimodal data and clinically relevant evaluation, revealing that patient context significantly improves diagnostic accuracy.
Clinical diagnosis of meniscus injuries requires radiologists to integrate volumetric MRI evidence with patient context (e.g., sex, age, BMI) and to produce structured diagnostic reports. Existing knee MRI benchmarks are typically unimodal and rely on coarse labels, limiting their ability to evaluate holistic clinical reasoning. We introduce MeniOmni, a structured multimodal benchmark for meniscus injury assessment, consisting of 746 multi-center MRI studies with tri-planar volumetric inputs, Clinical Priors, and expert-annotated clinical text. MeniOmni supports two tasks: (1) fine-grained Stoller severity grading and (2) diagnostic report generation. We further propose risk-aware ordinal evaluation and a semantic consistency metric (Meni-Score) to better reflect clinical relevance. Baseline experiments show that incorporating Clinical Priors improves grading performance and reduces severe errors, highlighting the value of multimodal context for safer assessment. Code and data are available at https://github.com/ShuruiXu/MeniOmni.
