Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
The paper introduces BRANE, a system that dynamically configures retrieval agent pipelines on a per-query basis to optimize for cost or accuracy. BRANE uses an LLM to extract query-specific features and trains lightweight predictors to estimate the correctness of different pipeline configurations. Experiments across multiple datasets demonstrate that BRANE significantly improves the cost-quality tradeoff compared to static configurations and other baselines.
Stop hand-tuning your retrieval pipelines: BRANE slashes costs by up to 89% while matching accuracy by dynamically configuring pipelines per query.
Modern retrieval agents expose many configuration choices -- LLM, retriever, number of documents, number of hops, and synthesis strategy -- each shaping both answer quality and serving cost. Today, these pipelines are typically hand-tuned once per workload, leaving substantial per-query optimization untapped. We formulate the problem: given a natural-language query and either an accuracy or a budget target, select from a predefined pipeline catalog the configuration that minimizes cost or maximizes accuracy at inference time. We propose **BRANE**, which uses an LLM to convert each query into workload-specific characteristics, then trains a lightweight per-configuration predictor that estimates whether the pipeline will answer the query correctly. At inference time, **BRANE** selects the configuration that maximizes predicted correctness penalized by cost, exposing a tunable cost-quality tradeoff without retraining. Across MuSiQue, BrowseComp-Plus, and FinanceBench, **BRANE** consistently pushes the cost-quality Pareto frontier, matches the best fixed configuration's accuracy at up to 89% lower cost, and outperforms LLM-routing, rule-based, and fine-tuned Qwen3-4B baselines. These results show that per-query configuration of the full retrieval pipeline is a practical alternative to static workload-level tuning.
BAIR
Microsoft Research