Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
The authors introduce FineVLA, a framework for generating and utilizing fine-grained, action-aligned vision-language-action (VLA) supervision for robotic tasks, addressing the limitations of existing datasets with coarse goal-level language. They construct FineVLA-Data, a human-verified dataset of 47,159 fine-grained trajectories from 10 open-source robot datasets, and train a steerable VLA policy using controlled mixtures of fine-grained and raw goal-level instructions. Experiments demonstrate that fine-grained supervision improves both goal-level success and steerable control, particularly in aspects like pose, color, and approach direction, without sacrificing overall task completion.
Forget vague goals – robots learn to *really* listen when you tell them *how* to do things, boosting real-world manipulation success by 25%.
Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models are increasingly expected to not only complete robot tasks, but also follow human instructions about how those tasks should be executed. However, existing robot datasets usually pair trajectories with coarse goal-level language, leaving execution-critical details such as active arm, approach direction, and contact region unspecified. This limits steerable policy learning and robotic video understanding. We introduce FineVLA, an open framework for action-aligned fine-grained VLA supervision. The framework includes: (1) a data construction tool that unifies 972,247 trajectories across 85K tasks from 10 open-source robot datasets and builds FineVLA-Data, a human-verified dataset of 47,159 fine-grained trajectories; (2) a held-out benchmark with 500 videos, 10,816 atomic facts, and 1,030 VQA questions; (3) a robotics-specialized VLM annotator for scalable fine-grained annotation; and (4) a steerable VLA policy trained with controlled mixtures of fine-grained and raw goal-level instructions. Our experiments yield three findings. First, fine-grained supervision does not sacrifice goal-level success: FG-only improves over Raw-only by +1.4 to +8.1 success-rate points across settings. Second, fine-grained and raw instructions are complementary, following a consistent inverted-U trend peaking at FG:Raw = 1:2 to 1:1. The best mixed setting reaches 86.8%/82.5% in RoboTwin simulation and 62.7/100 in real-world dual-arm manipulation (vs. 49.9 Raw-only). Third, fine-grained supervision improves steerable control: the largest real-world gains appear on pose (+23), color (+18), and approach direction (+18)--factors where goal-level instructions provide no guidance. Overall, fine-grained language should augment goal-level instructions: specifying how to execute alongside what to achieve. Project page: https://finevla.xlang.ai/
