Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
DistractionBench is introduced to evaluate the temporal grounding and subject-event linking capabilities of VideoLLMs by inserting distracting, unrelated video segments. Experiments reveal that VideoLLMs exhibit a "bag-of-events" behavior, hallucinating interactions between entities from different segments and failing to maintain temporal consistency. Evaluation of 11 popular VideoLLMs demonstrates that all models exhibit this behavior, highlighting a critical weakness in their ability to understand temporally structured video.
VideoLLMs are surprisingly bad at keeping track of who did what, frequently mixing up actions across different video segments like a confused movie editor.
A key capability for video understanding is reliably linking subjects to events across time, yet whether Video Large Language Models (VideoLLMs) actually achieve this remains unclear. In this work, we introduce DistractionBench to evaluate whether VideoLLMs can robustly link subjects and events in the presence of unrelated video segments. Through controlled interventions, such as inserting short advertisement clips into longer videos, we show that VideoLLMs frequently hallucinate interactions between entities from different segments, incorrectly attributing actions from injected advertisements to subjects in the main video. We characterize this systematic hallucination as bag-of-events (BoE) behavior, where models process videos as collections of events rather than temporally structured sequences. Evaluating 11 popular VideoLLMs, we find that all models exhibit substantial BoE behavior. Our findings suggest that VideoLLMs lack reliable mechanisms for temporal grounding and motivate the development of models with more robust subject-event association.
Stanford HAI