Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper analyzes 260K GitHub Actions workflows to understand the usage and evolution of 197 language constructs and their impact on workflow reliability and maintainability. The study finds that only a small subset of constructs are frequently used, and larger, more complex workflows exhibit higher failure rates and require more maintenance. The authors identify specific workflow features that correlate with increased reliability and maintainability risks.
Complex GitHub Actions workflows are a reliability nightmare: larger workflows fail more often and demand more maintenance.
Developers often struggle with maintaining GitHub Actions workflow configurations in GitHub-hosted repositories, with recent studies showing frequent execution failures. This paper empirically explores how the adoption and evolution of GitHub Actions language constructs impacts workflow reliability and maintainability. To do so, we quantitatively analyse 260K workflows from 49K GitHub repositories to understand how they are used in practice and how their usage has evolved from July 2019 to August 2025. We identify 197 language constructs available in the GitHub Actions language and map them to 14 features reflecting workflow capabilities. We observe that only a small set of constructs and features are used very frequently, and that larger and more complex workflows are associated with higher failure rates and more maintenance effort. We identify specific features that are more likely to be linked with reliability and maintainability risks. These insights can help practitioners and researchers improve their understanding and usage of the GitHub Actions language, which can help in improving and sustaining workflow automation practices.
