Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This study investigates how the speed and accuracy of an AI assistant (Fast/Less-Accurate vs. Slow/Accurate) impact human-AI team performance in a VR drone search task using collaborative Brain-Computer Interfaces (cBCI). They found that fast AI leads to blind compliance and performance collapse, while slow AI induces cognitive conflict but eventual recovery. By adapting a Riemannian Oracle to capture temporal windows of reflexive compliance and cognitive conflict, they demonstrate that integrating these signals via hybrid fusion can rescue fast AI teams and accelerate recovery for slow AI teams.
Blind trust in fast AI can tank human accuracy to 50%, but slowing things down lets humans recover – and a smart BCI can tell the difference.
The speed and accuracy of an artificial teammate fundamentally alter the failure states of Human-AI integration. While high-speed AI interventions risk inducing reflexive blind compliance, delayed interventions can induce ambiguous cognitive conflict. This study investigates how the fundamental characteristics of an in-task AI assistant, Fast/Less-Accurate (FLA-AI) versus Slow/Accurate (SA-AI) impact the synergy of Collaborative Brain-Computer Interface (cBCI) teams in a Virtual Reality drone task. Seventeen operators completed continuous search tasks under high cognitive workload while their spatial covariance was mapped using a 2D Adaptive Riemannian Oracle. The results mathematically demonstrate that AI timing dictates the mechanism of team failure. Fast AI induced instant, blind compliance; human accuracy under deception collapsed to 50.2%, and pure behavioural teams (N=8) failed to scale beyond 74.1%. In contrast, Slow AI induced delayed cognitive conflict; humans hesitated (61.1% accuracy), but N=8 behavioural teams eventually recovered to 100.0%. Crucially, the Riemannian Oracle mathematically adapted to these states: it heavily restricted temporal windows (< 0.8s) to intercept fast reflexive compliance, while widening windows (> 1.2s) to capture delayed cognitive conflict. Integrating these isolated veridical signals via Hybrid Fusion successfully rescued the Fast AI team (+7.6% at N=8) and significantly accelerated the recovery of smaller Slow AI teams (+6.9% at N=4). These findings prove that cBCI synergy is heavily contingent on the temporal dynamics of trust, providing a critical framework for designing dynamically gated Human-AI systems.
