Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper extends Nakamura's single-period Kyle model privacy-subsidy result to a continuous-time setting. It analyzes a Bayesian automated market maker observing order flow perturbed by Brownian noise, deriving a closed-form expression for the cumulative expected transfer (privacy subsidy) from the liquidity pool to traders. The authors then establish a duality between this privacy subsidy and Loss-Versus-Rebalancing (LVR), framing privacy-noise welfare as the order-flow analog of LVR's price observation gap.
Privacy noise in continuous-time AMMs creates a quantifiable subsidy from the liquidity pool to traders, mirroring the dynamics of loss-versus-rebalancing.
We extend the closed-form privacy-subsidy result of Nakamura~(2026, arXiv:2605.15746) from the single-period Kyle model to continuous-time. A committed Bayesian automated market maker observes the aggregate order flow perturbed by an independent Brownian privacy channel of diffusion intensity $蟽_\varepsilon$. Under the Markovian linear equilibrium, the price-impact coefficient is $位= 蟽_v / \sqrt{蟽_u^2 + 蟽_\varepsilon^2}$ -- constant in time -- and the cumulative expected transfer from the protocol's liquidity pool to traders over $[0,1]$ is $|螤_M| = 蟽_v 蟽_\varepsilon^2 / \sqrt{蟽_u^2 + 蟽_\varepsilon^2}$. We then establish a structural duality between this cumulative privacy subsidy and Loss-Versus-Rebalancing (Milionis et al.~2022), identifying privacy-noise welfare as the order-flow observation analog of LVR's price observation gap. The result completes the program of quantifying break-even fees for committed-AMM exchanges under privacy-aggregated information environments.
