Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces a framework for simulating students with specific skill profiles using prompted language models, enabling controlled experimentation in teacher education. They use an explicit skill vector to represent a student's competencies and prompt-based control to specify which skills are retained or suppressed. Experiments in a structured mathematics setting demonstrate that selective partial mastery can be induced and measured, though controllability varies across models.
LLMs can be steered to simulate students with specific strengths and weaknesses, opening the door to AI-driven teacher training.
Teacher education requires deliberate practice with learners who exhibit identifiable strengths, weaknesses, and partial mastery. Large language models could support such practice by simulating students with known skill components, enabling teachers to rehearse explanations, diagnoses, and instructional responses. For this purpose, however, the central requirement is neither to maximize benchmark accuracy nor to suppress isolated facts, but to control model behavior so that it reflects a specified skill profile. This paper investigates whether prompted language models can be steered to retain some skills while suppressing others. We introduce a benchmark-oriented framework in which an explicit skill vector represents a simulated student, prompt-based control specifies retained and missing competencies, and behavior is evaluated using profile-alignment metrics, retained-versus-forgotten comparisons, and cross-skill calibration analyses. The results show that selective partial mastery can be induced and measured in a structured mathematics setting, although the degree of controllability remains model-dependent. These findings position controllable learner simulation as a distinct research problem at the intersection of teacher education, educational simulation, and language-model control.
