Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper investigates the dynamics of LLM confidence during inference-time optimization, revealing that correct reasoning trajectories exhibit increasing confidence while incorrect ones show declining confidence. Based on this observation, they propose Confidence Dynamic Gain (CDG) based voting, which weights samples based on the change in confidence over the reasoning chain. Experiments across multiple models and benchmarks show that CDG significantly improves performance compared to standard voting methods.
LLMs get more sure of themselves when they're right, but lose confidence when they're wrong – a surprisingly reliable signal that can boost reasoning performance.
Inference time optimization techniques, such as repeated sampling, have significantly advanced the reasoning capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs). However, the critical role of model uncertainty remains largely underexplored in these optimization strategies. In this paper, we investigate the dynamics of confidence along reasoning trajectories and for first time reveal a surprising and unique pattern: correct answer traces tend to exhibit confidence improvement over time (positive confidence gain), while incorrect traces show attenuated or declining confidence as reasoning proceeds. Based on this observation, we propose Confidence Dynamic Gain (CDG) based voting, which incorporates how the confidence trajectory of the response evolves along the reasoning chain. Experiments across four open-source architectures (DeepSeek-R1, gpt-oss, Gemma-3, Qwen-QwQ) on the AIME24/25, HMMT25, and BRUMO25 benchmarks demonstrate that CDG yields a significant performance boost over baselines. These results demonstrate that our method provides a robust discriminative signal for improving answer selection in LLM reasoning. We also provide theoretical insights for this phenomenon. Code will be released at https://github.com/Accenture/CDG.git.
