Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper analyzes the approximation and statistical complexity of Multiple Neural Operators (MNOs) in multi-task operator learning, deriving near-optimal upper bounds for Lipschitz operator maps. It establishes a curse of parametric complexity and proves minimax rates, demonstrating that shared representations in MNOs do not increase the overall learning cost compared to single-task operator learning. The analysis also compares MNOs with a multi-task DeepONet variant, finding that both architectures achieve similar asymptotic approximation rates.
Multi-task operator learning with shared representations doesn't cost you extra – it scales just as well as learning each operator individually.
We study the approximation and statistical complexity of learning collections of operators in a shared multi-task setting, with a focus on the Multiple Neural Operators (MNO) architecture. For broad classes of Lipschitz multiple operator maps, we derive near-optimal upper bounds for approximation and statistical generalization. On the lower-bound side, we establish a curse of parametric complexity and prove corresponding minimax rates. Together, these results show that shared representations across tasks do not increase the overall cost: multi-task operator learning follows the same scaling laws as single operator learning. We also compare MNO with a multi-task extension of DeepONet based on concatenated task inputs and show that, from a worst-case approximation-complexity perspective, both architectures satisfy essentially the same asymptotic rates.
