Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces a multi-dimensional evasion framework (Temporal, Spatial, and Semantic) to evaluate the security vulnerabilities of LLM-based autonomous agents in stateful, multi-turn interactions. The authors construct A3S-Bench, a benchmark with 2,254 real-world agent execution trajectories, to systematically quantify these threats across 10 mainstream LLMs and 20 practical threat scenarios. Results show that the proposed evasion framework significantly elevates the average risk trigger rate from 28.3% to 52.6%, exposing critical architecture-level vulnerabilities.
LLM-powered autonomous agents are alarmingly susceptible to multi-turn, context-aware attacks that bypass standard security measures, nearly doubling the risk trigger rate.
As autonomous agents (e.g., OpenClaw) increasingly operate with deep system-level privileges to execute complex tasks, they introduce severe, unmitigated security risks. Current vulnerability analyses overwhelmingly focus on single-turn, stateless behaviors, overlooking the expanded attack surface inherent in stateful, multi-turn interactions and dynamic tool invocations. In this paper, we propose a novel, multi-dimensional evasion framework targeting LLM-based agent systems. We introduce three stealthy attack vectors: (1) Temporal evasion, which fragments malicious payloads across sequential interaction turns; (2) Spatial evasion, which conceals payloads within complex external artifacts that evade standard LLM parsing mechanisms; and (3) Semantic evasion, which obscures malicious intents beneath benign contextual noise. To systematically quantify these threats, we construct A3S-Bench, a comprehensive benchmark comprising 2,254 real-world agent execution trajectories. Evaluating a standard agent framework separately integrated with 10 mainstream LLM backbones against 20 practical threat scenarios, we demonstrate that our evasion framework elevates the average risk trigger rate from a 28.3\% baseline to 52.6\%. These findings reveal systemic, architecture-level vulnerabilities in current autonomous agent systems that existing defenses fail to address, highlighting an urgent need for defense mechanisms tailored to the unique threats.