Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper investigates the relationship between the structure of embedding spaces and the performance of 25 embedding models on MTEB benchmark tasks. It finds strong correlations (up to 0.97) between nearest-neighbor overlap and magnitude differences in independent component analysis (ICA) of paired text embeddings and task performance across retrieval, bitext mining, pair classification, and summarization. The study reveals that different embedding tasks exhibit varying degrees of linearity and reliance on local information retention in the embedding space.
Forget training objectives – the secret to a great embedding model might just be how consistently it organizes its embedding space.
In this paper, we show that high-performing embedding models organize their embedding spaces in a consistent way. We evaluate 25 contemporary embedding models on five MTEB tasks spanning four diverse task categories (retrieval, bitext mining, pair classification, and summarization) in both English and multilingual settings, and reveal that nearest-neighbor overlap and magnitude differences in independent component analysis (ICA) between paired text instances strongly correlate (even up to 0.97) with performance on the given task. Ultimately, we show that embedding tasks display varying degrees of linearity and reliance on retention of local information. Our results further the understanding of embeddings, their relation to model performance, and shed light on possible future training objectives and optimizing conditional embeddings.
